R2R Encryptor The Suppliers Tools v1.0.0-R2R

Respect for who? Respect would be not allowing their tools to be repackaged. Respect would be not allowing their work to be stolen without even so much as credit. Respect would be ejecting the scrubs that do nothing but talk trash about the team and cause problems here

you're saying it like i personally done those things

Respect is what you do, not what you say. And since this tools has been released by R2R, it is obvious that they want it to be shared, therefore here we are, officially sharing it.

And like i said before multiple times, if any team is unhappy with what's going on here, they know how to reach me.

Dear Catalyst and Saint, this situation iss confusing for most of us. One thing that happen here in result of the crack strike is that people are more greatfull and civilizes. So both sites cannot carry the weight of all ungreatefull Leachers of the world... People really wanna give but do not know what and if cannot give a full product, at least wanna give a piece of, until now I do no read anyone that do not wanna give. The problem seams more a lack of information and/or instrument, I know that MSJ asks dor donativos and buy software for the teams... A lot of energúmeno was expended with things that we cannot change instead looking for people that share information and have the instruments that can give what the teams want....

lpu2n, we have something very similar at AudioSEX
however it is impossible to make a conveyor out of it and i'm not really up to this job. i'm an artist and i want to create, something new, something useful for you guys. i cannot physically administer everything

and btw i don't need to send stuff to R2R because we have plenty of our own crackers, personally i'm more interested in AudioZ Exclusive releases. like i said above in comments, AudioZ may not directly benefit from the fact that someone supplies software to R2R, but i want to support them as i can and it's the right thing to do.

I think you found your very own clique with me rico, even more so for the others to hate. I can think of countless posts that received "bad" attention, therefore the downvotes came, and of course people have to jump on the clique bandwagon. From my recollections, and not to call anyone out, this is just the perfect incident to display such an example, Nano was one of those people. God it feels good when someone else can see through the BS also. I have nothing against Cat and have a lot of respect for him. We have probably lost communication due to other disagreements but some things are just hard to deny when the proof is in plain site. This place shouldn't be a popularity contest, and yes the rating system is flawed. So yes I do get upset when someone starts downvoting for no reason, only cause their friend in their "club" does. It's not really the numbers that matter, it's the principle on which people act that we can very much feel here in cyber world.

I'm just honestly thankful for all this site has done for me and things i've learned from it, but honestly if everything would come to a crashing halt, I would still go about my day just glad I had the chance to be part of something.

Thank you -- like a hundred times over, thank you!

You know, the number of people that have privately gotten to me this week to state support, while at the same time acknowledging a sense of fear to speak up at AudioZ nowadays, is invigorating and depressing all at once. I'm glad to see some understand and agree--- there's hope in that, but as someone that's come around this site for many, many years I'm saddened that people have a sense of fear here that didn't used to exist.

That's where it really gets me -- just look at the few posts below (which I will minimally address after this post to you) and you'll see what's come of it here. The "clique" attack dogs waste no time crawling out of their holes.

Thanks again, I appreciate your kindness.

Daz, I'm torn over whether its even worth the few moments to bother answering your comment.

You know, I remember a time awhile back that you PM'd me to tell me I was right all along about an issue that had much heated discussion here on AudioZ some time ago, just like this discussion now. Though its awhile back, it's my recollection that you originally disagreed in a largely insulting manner with me then as well (surprise!, Cat did too), which was why you were sending me that PM -- you were, in your own way, righting an earlier wrong. If you like I can upload that message to a hoster, and put a link for it here if you're confused as to my reference.....

Now I'm beginning to think that maybe you're just slow on the uptake -- maybe you need some additional time to be able to process what's wrong and what's right, just like you did back then when you sent me that old PM. Then again, you'd probably say I was being condescending by saying that. Depending on one's intellect, and the correctness of their position, it can be a fine line between being honest, and condescension. Ahem....

Now, I don't know of any instance I've been rude to you, nor do I feel there's been a particularly outlandish rudeness on this thread (other than you starting to curse, which I certainly haven't done), but that underscores the problem here.... it's clear who my grievance is with, but then the clique boys show up to fight someone else's battles. Children do that sort of thing. It's pathetic, and really merits little comment. I can fight my own battles, but you're demonstrating you're not made of the same stuff, and either are those you show your support.

What's really too bad is that your fearless leader can't fight his own battles, and the clique boys need to do it for him. That's the only interpretation I can reach about your comment (and Nanobeat's as well). That right there in a nutshell is my problem with Cat-- the bullying, the deletion of comments time and time again for no other reason than that he disagree's with them, the dishonesty, the chest-thumping egotism, the fact that it turned this place into a battlefield that never before existed. I wonder if some time in the future you'll be sending me a PM telling me I was right about this too. There's always hope since you did so in the past. Please understand though, next time I'll hope you'll be brave enough to do it in public rather than having to do it in a PM. It shows more guts.

As for this thread, unlike you I do know whether this R2R release should have been 'posted or not'. First, because I've personally used it, second, because R2R has been the premier release group for a long while now and if its good enough for them its good enough for me, , and third, because SAiNT approved of this thread being here. It's his place. End of discussion. And when your boy stops sulking over that fact, maybe he can come by and speak for himself.

Daz --hey, definitely harsh, over-the-top. You sound worse than anything I've seen said on this thread. In fact nothing on this thread comes close to that level of rudeness.

Nano -- again, I'm not assuming anything. I saw what Cat said on that thread, and that's what I put my faith in. Based on the comments that were being made on that thread by him and others, as well as the timing of when the thread was deleted, I have complete faith that Cat pulled the thread for the reasons I've stated. It's not the first time he's deleted threads and/or comments for no other reason than a personal like or dislike of what was being said.

You haven't said if you were around watching that thread. I know I was. I saw whatever I needed to see to reach the conclusion I reached. And what does it matter now anyway? SAiNT said the thread should be restored, and so the point you want to keep arguing about is clearly moot. It's been decided. Pat your boy on the back a few times, and treat him to some Cherry Coca Cola's until he feels better about it all, okay????? Who cares? This is a done deal!

Funny you use the same words as Cat in criticizing some unknown and unidentified "agenda" you claim I have -- I'm not surprised that you mimic just what he said -- like I've noted above, that seems to be your entire reason for being here and saying what you're saying. You're a shill for Catalyst, nothing more. Be my guest. It won't change a damn thing. You're fighting for Catalyst's ego, and that means there's really nothing for anyone to win here.


As for the comment you've quoted, I've seen Catalyst mention at least a few dozen times about wanting to make AudioZ a "private" site. I'd be really surprised if you've not seen his comments on that yourself since your obviously such a fan of his. If not, do the research, you'll easily find those comments.

Finally, I didn't start this thread. In fact, I didn't even comment here until there was already quite a few comments. My first comment was a reply to something SAiNT said. Although I can understand why someone's else's attack dog would want to try and make it about me --- then your boyfriend Cat can point a finger and say, see, it's all Rico's fault. Sorry, but it's not. SAiNT ok'd this thread -- I support that, but it's not me who had the decision to make.

As much as you and Cat, and now Daz want to make it about me, it's not. It's about an R2R release. It's about the site owner righting a wrong, it's about people voicing an opinion about it -- and now you and your buddy are trying to turn it into a personal attack on someone else. Whatever makes you and Cat feel better, go right ahead. I always respond. Like clockwork.

@nanobeat --

Again, you seem to want to persist in arguing about a meaningless point. Let's flip the coin on this for a moment and say I'm wrong and you're right. Well, if you're right it would only be because you're assuming you knew better as to what was going on in someone else's mind when the original thread was deleted. Either way, we're both reaching conclusions based on a certain experience, combined with our personal assumptions as to what that experience means, and what's really going on in someone else's head.

Therefore, I don't really get where you've been attempting to go with this sort of thinking. None of us will ever fully know what went on in another person's mind, but day in and day out we make our best determinations about that sort of thing. In fact, that's what goes on in courtrooms every day of the week -- people attempting to figure out what really went on in someone else's mind. Right? We have to, because that's all we can really go on.

That's all I've done. You're certainly entitled to disagree and reach a different conclusion. I only wish I didn't feel your disagreement had more to do with an affiliation with Cat than anything I've actually been saying.

I wish you good luck, as well.

good enough! I'll even give you an up-vote just to show you I have a big heart and never, ever hold a grudge. :)