please read the rules, it will answer all your questions!

  • Get the best VPN on the market with 66% Discount!
Education » Video Tutorials
PUREMIX Andrew Scheps Revisiting Lifeboats TUTORiAL REPACK-SYNTHiC4TE screenshot
SYNTHiC4TE | Feb 12 2021 | 696 MB
In 2015, a previous version of world-renowned mixing engineer, Andrew Scheps, mixed "Lifeboats". Now he returns five years later as "Future Andrew'' to revisit the mix and see what has changed in his template.
See how future Andrew:

Explains why he lobbied for the Pre-Fader send flag in Pro Tools
A/Bs between his original Stereo Bus processing and his updated Stereo Bus processing
Demonstrates how he uses reverb on the stereo bus to achieve the glue and cohesiveness of a Stereo Bus Compressor, without the compression
Disses Andrew from 5 years ago and steals his gig
Revisits the bass to get it to interact with the song, and enhance the midrange
Uses clip gain as automation
Crushes the room mics and uses them as a lift in the bridge
Watch future Andrew Scheps revisit his mix of Lifeboats, only on pureMix.net

REPACK Notes
We forgot to pack part 2 of the video the first time


download from free file storage
click to show download links
download from any file hoster with just one LinkSnappy account
download from more than 100 file hosters at once with LinkSnappy.
audioz mirror
http://http://peeplink.in/253431ae7cd8 Peeplink password: mh9G#}@

comments

  Member 28.11.2016 913
+312
Cool idea to go back... seeing how/why he'd change stuff up.
  Banned 13.05.2014 64 768
+2691
Have you guys heard about his new book?
Andrew Scheps: "Eat, Pray, Overcompress"?
  Resident 8.11.2020 70 184
+2736
he said in the beginning of the teaser : " hey kids" ... so this Tutorial is only for Kids ? lol
  Member 7.12.2016 12
0
Looks like the end of the video is missing...or this is only the first video, and the others are missing
  Resident 2.09.2016 788
+166
Andrew Scheps just said that the enhance(curve) fader in the oxford limiter is an inflator, really?
My sudo is dead
  Member 7.12.2016 12
0
yes it is.kind of.
https://support.sonnox.com/support/solutions/articles/22000200599-what-s-the-difference-between-the-inflator-and-limiter-enhance-fader-
  Member 2.04.2018 65 37
+1126
The end of the video is missing :-(
  Releaser 4.11.2010 6696 1435
+530759
Post is now updated to REPACK
Greetz..ASSiGN, AudioP2P, ST3REO, 0TH3Rside, CHAOS, R2R.
AudioUTOPiA
  Resident 2.09.2016 788
+166
quote by beatcokeyes it is.kind of.
https://support.sonnox.com/support/solutions/articles/22000200599-what-s-the-difference-between-the-inflator-and-limiter-enhance-fader-

Nope, yes It´s a "kind of" but enhance function is not an inflator.
Inflator is a static process and enhance function is a dynamic process. In fact the two can complement each other, but they are different things. Paul Frindle, the creator, explained it clearly
EDIT: precisely in the link that you send me it says it clearly: "The Inflator is not the same as the Enhance feature in the Oxford Limiter,"
My sudo is dead
  Resident 2.09.2016 788
+166
quote by SunsumAndrew Scheps just said that the enhance(curve) fader in the oxford limiter is an inflator, really?

Paul Frindle quote in Gearslutz:
I don't know where I have supposed to have said that the Inflator and limiter are similar?! But they are not at all and are definitely not interchangeable in any way.

The Inflator very basically speaking is a special kind of 'distortion generator' that has no dynamic activitiy over time, in other words it's a static process (i.e. it is not a compressor). It is designed to give the impression of loudness by providing the harmonic cues we associate with loud and stressed sounds - and increase the harmonic density of the programme in a way that is sympathetic to the ear.

------------

The enhance function of the limiter is a special kind of dynamic process that does not add distortion to steady state signals. It works over time, programme history, peak and average levels and LR stereo differences to limit the signal and squash peak events, whilst providing the listener with the impression that the peaks are still there! In this way it can sympathetically remove peak events so that you can provide more transparent limiting, or make the programme even louder without causing sample value overs.

It is used after the main leveller in the limiter application to allow you to use slower and softer attack times (which sound much more musical - particularly on percussion), without risking clipped sounds or overs due to peak overshoots.

If you select 'safe' mode the enhancer is always actively controling peaks - and the enhance slider lets you adjust the dynamic action from fairly neutral (where minimum audible differences occur) to full loudness increase (where it might get to sound ropey on some programme types).

---------------------------------------------

If you try to use the limiter and the Inflator together you get mixed results depending on the programme. Although they have totally different ways of working and provide different effects, they can accentuate the side effects of each other in a way that can be counter productive and end up sounding worse.

Generally putting the Inflator after the limiter (with the limiter's enhance wound up) will not increase the loudness very much before it starts to sound nasty. The reason for this is that the Inflator makes the action of the enhancer more obvious.

Putting the Inflator before the limiter is more successful in producing a grungy sheen to the programme, but will not really make it sound that much louder. SO the best settings for the Inflator in this case is with the curve set to in the range from -ve to half way.

I hope this is helpful :-)
My sudo is dead

related posts

REQ: Puremix Andrew Scheps Revisiting LifeboatsDrumDrops 60s Motown Kit: All Samples Pack MULTiFORMAT-DECiBELReViSiT Professional v1.7.9.3 Beta3 Incl.Keygen-MESMERiZEReViSiT Professional v1.7.4 Incl.Keygen-MESMERiZE

Spread the Word