registered members don't get popups... just sayin

  • Get the best VPN on the market with 66% Discount!
Education
Interactive Frequency Chart (offline version) Fixed screenshot
Interactive Frequency Chart (offline version) Fixed | 2.29 MB
A version for use on computers without internet access. 100% functional
Includes interactive graphical of Fletcher Munson curve.

The old version that dont work anymore.


download from free file storage
click to show download links

download from any file hoster with just one LinkSnappy account
download from more than 100 file hosters at once with LinkSnappy.

comments

  Resident 4.05.2011 1074
+477
You are...wonderous. Gratitudes, dude.
Music is always a commentary on society.
Frank Zappa
  Member 4.08.2015 40 662
+2092
Nooooo, these are silly. Use your ears, guys - don't overthink EQ'ing. Don't become rigid that you focus more on these charts and specific frequencies that you become inflexible. If it sounds good, it *is* good.
  Resident 31.05.2010 4 2301
+552
I dont know how other use this chart or similar ones
But for me it is useful when i use my HP and LP filters to cut out unwanted frequencies in my mixes as i cant for my life remember all instruments only the basic ones like Guitar Bass Drums Vocals.
I never used chart like this for EQ:ing
  Resident 24.09.2013 8 777
+1453
You are wrong. You're assuming you can even trust your ears. What monitors are you using? In what environment? You NEED charts and spectral analyzers. The professionals use them for a reason. The "trust your ears" advice is some of the worst you can give.

music radar
https://soundcloud.com/army-of-ninjas
  Resident 27.02.2013 320
+113
Are the fans listening to songs while staring at a frequency chart that prompts them to enjoy what they are hearing? Answer: No. And the one/s responsible for each mix independently are obligated to use their ears intuition in the perspective of what masses of ears will enjoy. That's why there are so many presets being passed around and the best ones for the users always wind up being the user's own. It's because mixing is not a precise art.. mixing is a form of creativity without boundaries and it calls for something different every time. Only in the market of business there is somewhat of a boundary that depends upon what satisfies the masses in any given era/genre. But today's mixes don't sound like those of the 50's-60's, and tomorrow's won't sound like today's. A mixing engineer's task is about studying the interests of people and responding to the people if you want it to serve masses, and not responding to what he/she is instructed to do from a written chart. Why is it we all hear better when we close our eyes?
  Resident 24.09.2013 8 777
+1453
Okay, but again, to clarify: no listening environment is perfect--or the same. What sounds great in your studio may sound like crap in mine. The whole idea of using monitors at all is to remove this problem by ensuring that you are mixing on as flat a frequency response as possible. But no monitoring system is perfect. It is colored by placement. acoustic reflections, etc. So you DO need tools like frequency charts and analyzers. To argue otherwise is simply amateurish and incorrect. No one is saying don't listen to your mix. But clearly. you underestimate the problems that occur from frequency masking and the like... Don't take my word for it. Ask a professional engineer. Any professional engineer. Like the ones that engineered the greatest sounding albums of all time.... Audio engineering is applied physics. There is no easy way around that fact. Work with ALL the tools at your disposal to make the most solid mixes possible--that sound great on the largest number of playback devices possible.
https://soundcloud.com/army-of-ninjas
  Resident 10.01.2013 452
+75
is this for windoze only?
Opinions are like mixtapes, i dont want to hear yours.
  Resident 24.05.2015 1 455
+188
quote by Army of NinjasYou are wrong. You're assuming you can even trust your ears. What monitors are you using? In what environment? You NEED charts and spectral analyzers. The professionals use them for a reason. The "trust your ears" advice is some of the worst you can give.
music radar



interesting read AoN. Im going to read up on this "Your ears shouldn't always be trusted, and your DAW's audio engine doesn't suck..."
  Member 24.03.2016 23
+2
Good to use this as a quick reference if you are pre-planning a mix and want to categorize different tracks to different frequency ranges. Gives you a starting point but I would never use this as an ending point. Start here, end with your ears.

Thanks for the chart.

related posts

Guitar Interactive - Issue 36, 2015Frequency charts[dead] Gary Garritan NRK Principles of Orchestration Interactive Course

Spread the Word