please read the rules, it will answer all your questions!

  • Get the best VPN on the market with 66% Discount!
Windows, Mac OSX
Guda Audio SynthR v1.3 [WiN-OSX] Incl Keygen-R2R screenshot

Team R2R | Oct 04 2019 | WiN 10.2 MB | OSX 9 MB
SynthR is a flexible synthesizer with drag and drop modulations, clean anti aliased oscillators and sweet saturated multi mode filter. It packs great effects and flexible LFO shapes. Use unison to create wide and fat sounds with up to 5 voices simultaneous at each note.

Easy to change color themes and looks.

No separate download for full version, available in 64/32 bit for Mac OSX 10.7+ in VST/AU and Windows VST.

SynthR has two oscillator modes. "classic" with analog type shapes and "spline" with easy to use flexible waveform editor and shape morphing effects.

This is what GuDa does :

1. Check the hosts patch. If it connects to 127.0.0.1, it goes to demo.
2. Check the connection to google.com.
3. Check license online (virtual.gudaaudio.com, gudaaudio.com).
If registered serial is not legit, it goes to demo.
4. When it fails connecting online check and google.com connection is OK,
it reverts to demo.

This means, if Guda server is dead, all legit user get deactivated. Only way
to avoid the deactivation is shutting down the connect to google.com, which
should be inconvinient for many users. We think this is not a right way.
Unless the requirements of the connection to their server is defined in the
license agreement, legit user always have rights to do that.

Our new release is not affected by google.com connection. Should be useful
even for the legit users :D




download from free file storage
click to show download links
download from any file hoster with just one LinkSnappy account
download from more than 100 file hosters at once with LinkSnappy.
audioz mirror
http://http://peeplink.in/8f1f2dfbeef7 Peeplink password: 1fN57{A|9*

comments

  Member 28.11.2016 913
+311
The more I use soft-synths, the more I realise how truly terrible they ALL are vs real analog.

I'm not talking about digital emulations like FM synths here.. just so called 'analog' synths. They absolutely suck. VAs and Roland's pathetic modern attempts at their classics included.

yeah, it's kind of off topic so... delete away but had to rant for a second.
  Resident 23.01.2012 181
+48
Thanks for sharing your wisdom.
Give me a break!
  Resident 19.10.2014 176
+27
I wonder if you could elaborate on what in particular you find so objectionable about software emulations of analog synths. (I hope that doesn't come across as antagonistic; I'm genuinely interested to hear your viewpoint, whether I turn out to agree with it or not.)
  Member 16.10.2018 5
0
You are right. And I'm not talking about efficiency, when you play with real thing.
  Banned 10.07.2014 1280
+587
I like good music of good audio quality. I don't care if it was made on Diva or some super costly hardware synth.
  Resident 30.12.2017 1 1735
+794
Well, at least with this release, you can still go to google and search for "top ten analog synth plugins that sound like the real thing" clickbait articles
  Member 28.01.2018 1 602
+197
Well I'm a Grammy award-winning keyboard player and I have perfect pitch so my hearing is pretty good. And I don't understand why ANYONE would want to pull out my Roland Juno-60 to use on a song INSTEAD of simply using TAL-U-NO-LX. The difference between the two is so negligible, that it can ONLY be BARELY heard when doing a cross-comparison and IMPOSSIBLE to be detected in a full mix of a song. In other words, neither you or anyone else on the planet can discern the difference in a test of say 5 examples. If anyone COULD correctly guess which synth I'm using ALL 5 times, I'd eat my words and bow down to them as my NEW guru, but I'm QUITE confident that Herbie Hancock, a PIONEER in synth music who ALSO uses analog emulations now, would remain my guru. Furthermore, an analog synth, in MY opinion, is simply USELESS in the production of TODAY'S POPULAR MUSIC unless you're into some genre of music that is DEFINED by using ONLY analog synths. Finally, anyone using ONLY analog synths to make music is just a person who gets satisfaction out of dissing "new" technologies because in MY opinion, they don't sound good enough ANYMORE to compete with "modern" sound synthesis. That's just MY opinion and admittedly not a fact that CAN even be qualified. But NEITHER can your statement saying that ALL soft-synths "are truly TERRIBLE vs real analog".
Learn how to make tight, radio-ready mixes with the STOCK plugins in your DAW. After that, THEN you can horde out!
  Member 20.05.2014 752
+116
There are sonic differences between VST and real hardware. Juno 60, Prophet 5, MS-20, polysix, etc etc ...ALL these hardware sound better. An average ear can hear it. YOU can ear it. Now does it matter in a full mix ? not really, if it's hidden behinds other instrument TAL or DIva will do the trick. But if, for exemple, you start with a solo synth riff...you'd better choose the real thing because It will sound better...but will you sell more tracks ? not sure.
  Resident 9.12.2015 4 407
+335
Do they actually charge for this synth? it sounds terrible
  Banned 3.05.2019 18
0
Yes, there really needs to be a category added
called "Garbage" for all the samples and more garbage samples

and another called "crap" with all the crap vsts and freeware crap
  Moderator 21.01.2012 2376 16093
+158915
You are right, we should create more categories, ... for members too, there would be one called the "ever criticizing ones that do nothing." Or "the ones that want the world to be exactly as they desire"

AudioZ will never represent exactly what you want, and only what you want, but there is more than enough for everyone to be happy. Still some like to look only at what is not as they like ...

Spread the Word