please read the rules, it will answer all your questions!

4.04.2016 @ 09:47 Windows, Mac OSX

U-He RePro build 4365 (Alpha!)[FREE]

It is an excessively CPU hungry anti-optimized monophonic synthesizer, in essence a stripped down version of the Sequential Circuits Pro-One we're currently modeling.

The research part is, we have implemented the same pretty extreme model of the CEM3320 Curtis filter chip in our vintage Pro-One using 5 different numerical methods, each costing a very different amount of CPU. We wish for you to spot the "most analogue" sounding method. By that we wish to see if it is worth spending a lot of CPU or if we could get away with something cheaper. Furthermore we wish to discuss the following questions:

what differences do you spot between the models?
when do these differences become audible, i.e. which settings promote these differences?

home page

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=460687

download from free file storage

download from any file hoster with just one LinkSnappy account

download from more than 100 file hosters at once with LinkSnappy.

comments

iNTEGRAL	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
iNTEGRAL	Resident	1.10.2013	4654	8899	+54364

No direct links and so many likes?
Where is the super company of dislikers? I think they sleeping deep

4.04.16 @ 10:13

moji20	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
moji20	Banned	3.08.2012	74	16960	+5174

mirror

Direct Link

http://peeplink.in/d1257c706e50

4.04.16 @ 10:30

rhino	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
rhino	Resident	28.01.2016	2	680	+519

the Comment has been Removed

4.04.16 @ 10:58

iNTEGRAL	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
iNTEGRAL	Resident	1.10.2013	4654	8899	+54364

the Comment has been Removed

5.04.16 @ 04:26

rhino	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
rhino	Resident	28.01.2016	2	680	+519

The links are in the very same home page he linked to, which is the forum page where you can download the links. It provides context and at the same time it directly shows where official links are, instead of linking to the generic home page (does it sound familiar?).
It doesn't even take more clicks to download from the official source thank using peeplink links. Furthermore if your brain is normally functioning you'll realize that the home page is the place where you should go when it's a [FREE] release.
Stop being an hypocrite, Integral.

5.04.16 @ 05:12

wasgedn	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
wasgedn	Banned	8.11.2014	8	2700	+1200

he isnt so smart....its not his fault alone lol

5.04.16 @ 06:25

wasgedn	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
wasgedn	Banned	8.11.2014	8	2700	+1200

crecy is integral double account....lol

5.04.16 @ 06:39

Olymoon	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
Olymoon	Moderator	21.01.2012	2361	16056	+161569

You used inappropriate language in violation our rules, so it's been cleared.
Be aware that we don't tolerate this here.

Read the rules (Click) and respect them

5.04.16 @ 05:14

rhino	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
rhino	Resident	28.01.2016	2	680	+519

as already said via message, I apologize about that and I'll make sure it won't happen again

6.04.16 @ 04:20

Krish	status	registered	comments	rating
Krish	Member	19.05.2014	29	+8

Official Links(KVR Forum)..

Win
Mac

4.04.16 @ 10:31

Freeloader	status	registered	comments	rating
Freeloader	Member	7.03.2016	10	0

nice one thanks!!!
...no presets???

4.04.16 @ 10:34

Articstorm	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
Articstorm	Contributor	3.05.2011	722	5117	+43964

its a frekking alpha dude, where should presets come from?
you know presets are made by human beings.

5.04.16 @ 13:03

jing	status	registered	comments	rating
jing	Member	17.01.2014	182	+52

I am not hater of anything music related but I would like to argue the reasons...
If Urs already has implemented 5 methods of modeling filter why doesn't he leave them all built in (or at least the most power hungry one, the least power hungry and whichever one sits in between) and lets user select on setup page whichever one they prefer depending on their sonic sensitivity and available cpu power? Maybe its just marketing, you know... involving community... we build stuff together etc. If so let's call it fishingware as opposed to researchware.

4.04.16 @ 10:34

impaler	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
impaler	Resident	5.12.2014	409	900	+8394

no crack? just install and go?

nice.

4.04.16 @ 10:38

nycdl	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
nycdl	Resident	10.05.2011	3	153	+227

This is exactly what you want to skip if you're serious about making music . Don't be a free R and D sheep. Huge FUCK YOU to Urs and U-He.

4.04.16 @ 10:41

fiction	status	registered	comments	rating
fiction	Resident	2.10.2008	551	+159

Dunno who you're talking about, but trying this alpha version and playing around with the 8 filter types is nothing like being a "free R&D sheep".
Take it as a chance to give a vote for further development directions - or just leave it, if you don't want to.

4.04.16 @ 11:14

nycdl	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
nycdl	Resident	10.05.2011	3	153	+227

you make a good point there .

4.04.16 @ 11:29

rosko	status	registered	comments	rating
rosko	Resident	24.03.2013	611	+217

Some proper idiots on here. One of the more generous and creative developers out there, i don't understand the negative comments.

4.04.16 @ 12:09

Olymoon	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
Olymoon	Moderator	21.01.2012	2361	16056	+161569

generous and creative developers out there .......Please....

5.04.16 @ 05:15

entodolado	status	registered	comments	rating
entodolado	Member	29.08.2015	73	+45

What an hypocrite Nycdl, I like your signature, but seems you just put it there without believing it. Better appreciate and shut up.

4.04.16 @ 16:15

Kookaboo	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
Kookaboo	Banned	13.05.2011	793	3871	+23638

This will be cracked very soon & fast....as every U-he thingy LOL!!

Just joking.

A monophonic synthesizer in year 2016 seems a bit outplaced...but anyway, if you have fun with it....

4.04.16 @ 10:42

limpets	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
limpets	Member	20.03.2014	1	248	+248

Urs is going for monophonic because Diva's filters eat too much cpu in polymode
This does sound pretty good for a alpha stage bit of emulation

4.04.16 @ 13:43

dokx1	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
dokx1	Resident	4.11.2010	1	1078	+92

quote by nycdlThis is exactly what you want to skip if you're serious about making music . Don't be a free R and D sheep. Huge FUCK YOU to Urs and U-He.

You seem just too dumb to be "serious about making music". Now how does that sound?

At least you did not understand the concept of this synth. Maybe a bit of reading would help?

4.04.16 @ 11:21

fiction	status	registered	comments	rating
fiction	Resident	2.10.2008	551	+159

quote by jingIf Urs already has implemented 5 methods of modeling filter why doesn't he leave them all built in

Maybe because Urs wants to get feedback on what we, the users, consider the best-sounding filter independent from its CPU consumption?
Isn't the *sound* what counts in the end?
Who knows if he's finally going to leave most filters inside...
I like the idea and how he implemented the constant CPU load.

4.04.16 @ 11:22

remixerone	status	registered	posts	comments	rating
remixerone	Resident	12.04.2012	6	593	+302

For those that don't read the official release:

"As predicted during Superbooth and elsewhere, today we're unleashing a new Researchware plug-in, RePro-Alpha (alpha version, not finished, cutdown, strip version from the final release, no presets, no all functions).

It is an excessively CPU hungry anti-optimized monophonic synthesizer, in essence a stripped down version of the Sequential Circuits Pro-One we're currently modeling.

The research part is, we have implemented the same pretty extreme model of the CEM3320 Curtis filter chip in our vintage Pro-One using 5 different numerical methods, each costing a very different amount of CPU. We wish for you to spot the "most analogue" sounding method. By that we wish to see if it is worth spending a lot of CPU or if we could get away with something cheaper."

4.04.16 @ 11:38

fiction	status	registered	comments	rating
fiction	Resident	2.10.2008	551	+159

My first impressions:
F1 has lots of aliasing - quite the opposite of analog
F2 and F5 sound similar and have the least aliasing
F3 and F4 are in-between, but F3 sounds cleaner to me.
This is all with higher resonance and modulation settings, otherwise the difference between all filters is barely noticeable.

If i had to pick my favourite it would be Filter No. 5, it's very obvious when doing audio-rate filter modulation for vowel sounds.

BTW, CPU load is surprisingly low on a 2.3GHz i7.

What do you guys think?

4.04.16 @ 12:08

sisyphus	status	registered	comments	rating
sisyphus	Resident	25.01.2014	2761	+1447

why would someone down vote fiction for giving editorial and salient information?

That is just silly.... up vote from me fiction, it's the help people give on this site, and the editorial info in the threads that are helpful, in addition to the hard work of the shares, teams, packers, suppliers, etc....