Rubin AI Replay v3.4.3 STANDALONE LiNUX WiN MAC [FREE]

Updated to v3.4.3

Rapidgator | Katfile

Does it work? Or is it another annoying unsupported undocumented zombie-release like previous versions?

quote by nmkerajRight, ryck.
Is he upset? What attitude is it? That’s why there are comments here to report any issues. It is for him especially and then for other users. Are other posters/developers upset when getting bug reports? If he is upset stop him here. Let him go to the place where he would be praised for his not-working “unsupported undocumented zombie-release”.

It is correct what you say. Likewise, whether he is upset or not and hence why he wouldn't respond, it's nothing more than my speculation based on the fact that, in a debate (as it was a debate among many about the pros and cons of AI in music), the author of this add-on in AS said that he felt 'attacked' in some way by several users, and that to avoid compromising his program here in AZ, he would distance himself from AS. So, based on this comment, I assume that either he is upset, or he doesn't want to comment on something out of 'fear' that his add-on will be harmed. Whatever the scenario, I believe there is nothing wrong with providing a list of changes in his program, I think most developers do that

quote by ALLinONEOnly one version gave an error, the other versions, with the 1st one I have work fine. win11,i9,2060s

That's not correct. I downloaded three versions, and all three have the same CUDA error. In fact, in AS, he replied, 'If you can't use CUDA, use CPU mode,' when I mentioned that in CPU mode it goes up to 100% and takes around 5 minutes to convert a few seconds.

quote by ericdaudiozMaybe the attitude of someone working for free, while ungrateful people are lashing out, and throwing stones, lacking respect and complaining 24/7?

He should just close the website and distribution, and come back with a 29.99$ per month subscription.

Not sure why developers are so kind on the internet with free stuff. they're getting laughed at and treated like b*tches.

You are not only mistaken but also way off. No one here is 'complaining 24/7'; that's a vague perception of yours. If you read my previous comments, I have always encouraged him with his project. However, it's not about you releasing a VST or software for free and my whole PC freezing, and then I say, 'Oh, it's great that my PC froze, but it's okay because it's free, so I'll just stay quiet.' No. Here it's about testing the programs, whether they're free or not, and communicating their strengths and weaknesses. I have already communicated their strengths, here and in AS to the same author, but if the author doesn't respond when we ask, 'Hey, have you fixed this?' and also doesn't provide a list of what's new in each version, then I think the program lacks information. Your response is hasty and incorrect.

Edit: Let me add something more. Look, critiques aren't meant to destroy; they're meant to build. What sense does it make for you to develop a VST and one of the knobs in your free VST doesn't work, and I say, 'Hey, it works fantastic' just because it's free? No, that's a serious mistake. I should point out all possible errors so that you can develop your VST better every day, and maybe it will become one of the best, and then tomorrow you decide if you want to continue giving it away for free or not. Additionally, many companies release free VSTs for promotion, even well-established companies. So, there are other factors here, such as exposure, testing new features, and the best thing a developer can have is transparency from users, whom you call 'unhappy dogs.' How unfortunate, how unfortunate!!!

quote by ryck

<span class='QuoteBy'>quote by nmkeraj</span>Right, ryck.
Is he upset? What attitude is it? That’s why there are comments here to report any issues. It is for him especially and then for other users. Are other posters/developers upset when getting bug reports? If he is upset stop him here. Let him go to the place where he would be praised for his not-working “unsupported undocumented zombie-release”.

It is correct what you say. Likewise, whether he is upset or not and hence why he wouldn't respond, it's nothing more than my speculation based on the fact that, in a debate (as it was a debate among many about the pros and cons of AI in music), the author of this add-on in AS said that he felt 'attacked' in some way by several users, and that to avoid compromising his program here in AZ, he would distance himself from AS. So, based on this comment, I assume that either he is upset, or he doesn't want to comment on something out of 'fear' that his add-on will be harmed. Whatever the scenario, I believe there is nothing wrong with providing a list of changes in his program, I think most developers do that

quote by ALLinONEOnly one version gave an error, the other versions, with the 1st one I have work fine. win11,i9,2060s

That's not correct. I downloaded three versions, and all three have the same CUDA error. In fact, in AS, he replied, 'If you can't use CUDA, use CPU mode,' when I mentioned that in CPU mode it goes up to 100% and takes around 5 minutes to convert a few seconds.

quote by ericdaudiozMaybe the attitude of someone working for free, while ungrateful people are lashing out, and throwing stones, lacking respect and complaining 24/7?

He should just close the website and distribution, and come back with a 29.99$ per month subscription.

Not sure why developers are so kind on the internet with free stuff. they're getting laughed at and treated like b*tches.

You are not only mistaken but also way off. No one here is 'complaining 24/7'; that's a vague perception of yours. If you read my previous comments, I have always encouraged him with his project. However, it's not about you releasing a VST or software for free and my whole PC freezing, and then I say, 'Oh, it's great that my PC froze, but it's okay because it's free, so I'll just stay quiet.' No. Here it's about testing the programs, whether they're free or not, and communicating their strengths and weaknesses. I have already communicated their strengths, here and in AS to the same author, but if the author doesn't respond when we ask, 'Hey, have you fixed this?' and also doesn't provide a list of what's new in each version, then I think the program lacks information. Your response is hasty and incorrect.

Edit: Let me add something more. Look, critiques aren't meant to destroy; they're meant to build. What sense does it make for you to develop a VST and one of the knobs in your free VST doesn't work, and I say, 'Hey, it works fantastic' just because it's free? No, that's a serious mistake. I should point out all possible errors so that you can develop your VST better every day, and maybe it will become one of the best, and then tomorrow you decide if you want to continue giving it away for free or not. Additionally, many companies release free VSTs for promotion, even well-established companies. So, there are other factors here, such as exposure, testing new features, and the best thing a developer can have is transparency from users, whom you call 'unhappy dogs.' How unfortunate, how unfortunate!!!

very strange CUDA works fine here with Nvidia Gtx 1080
btw replay is at version 3.4.3 not sure why this is here as the latest

Replay 3.4.3 website

Replay 3.4.3 download

Replay Discord Server

AMD Is not supported by RVC Vocal AI Software of any fork in github
so if you are using an AMD GPU your out of luck with any of the softwares
You are correct inference with the CPU option is quite a bit slower

Appilo 3.0.5 is out if you care to try a rvc fork that is being re- developed at present it also does vocal training to create your owned trained vocal packs like the shares on weights.gg and it also does tts {text to speech}
its best to download the precompiled version its around 5.13 gigs compressed

Appilio 3 Github

Applio Discord Server

Applio 3 precompiled Download

quote by RB-RING-0

quote by ryck

<span class='QuoteBy'>quote by nmkeraj</span>Right, ryck.
Is he upset? What attitude is it? That’s why there are comments here to report any issues. It is for him especially and then for other users. Are other posters/developers upset when getting bug reports? If he is upset stop him here. Let him go to the place where he would be praised for his not-working “unsupported undocumented zombie-release”.

It is correct what you say. Likewise, whether he is upset or not and hence why he wouldn't respond, it's nothing more than my speculation based on the fact that, in a debate (as it was a debate among many about the pros and cons of AI in music), the author of this add-on in AS said that he felt 'attacked' in some way by several users, and that to avoid compromising his program here in AZ, he would distance himself from AS. So, based on this comment, I assume that either he is upset, or he doesn't want to comment on something out of 'fear' that his add-on will be harmed. Whatever the scenario, I believe there is nothing wrong with providing a list of changes in his program, I think most developers do that

quote by ALLinONEOnly one version gave an error, the other versions, with the 1st one I have work fine. win11,i9,2060s

That's not correct. I downloaded three versions, and all three have the same CUDA error. In fact, in AS, he replied, 'If you can't use CUDA, use CPU mode,' when I mentioned that in CPU mode it goes up to 100% and takes around 5 minutes to convert a few seconds.

quote by ericdaudiozMaybe the attitude of someone working for free, while ungrateful people are lashing out, and throwing stones, lacking respect and complaining 24/7?

He should just close the website and distribution, and come back with a 29.99$ per month subscription.

Not sure why developers are so kind on the internet with free stuff. they're getting laughed at and treated like b*tches.

You are not only mistaken but also way off. No one here is 'complaining 24/7'; that's a vague perception of yours. If you read my previous comments, I have always encouraged him with his project. However, it's not about you releasing a VST or software for free and my whole PC freezing, and then I say, 'Oh, it's great that my PC froze, but it's okay because it's free, so I'll just stay quiet.' No. Here it's about testing the programs, whether they're free or not, and communicating their strengths and weaknesses. I have already communicated their strengths, here and in AS to the same author, but if the author doesn't respond when we ask, 'Hey, have you fixed this?' and also doesn't provide a list of what's new in each version, then I think the program lacks information. Your response is hasty and incorrect.

Edit: Let me add something more. Look, critiques aren't meant to destroy; they're meant to build. What sense does it make for you to develop a VST and one of the knobs in your free VST doesn't work, and I say, 'Hey, it works fantastic' just because it's free? No, that's a serious mistake. I should point out all possible errors so that you can develop your VST better every day, and maybe it will become one of the best, and then tomorrow you decide if you want to continue giving it away for free or not. Additionally, many companies release free VSTs for promotion, even well-established companies. So, there are other factors here, such as exposure, testing new features, and the best thing a developer can have is transparency from users, whom you call 'unhappy dogs.' How unfortunate, how unfortunate!!!

very strange CUDA works fine here with Nvidia Gtx 1080

AMD Is not supported by RVC Vocal AI Software of any fork in github
so if you are using an AMD GPU your out of luck with any of the softwares
You are correct inference with the CPU option is quite a bit slower

Appilo 3.0.5 is out if you care to try a rvc fork that is being re- developed at present it also does vocal training to create your owned trained vocal packs like the shares on weights.gg and it also does tts {text to speech}
its best to download the precompiled version its around 5.13 gigs compressed

Appilio 3 Github

Applio 3 precompiled Download

If I have an AMD, I had already downloaded some other projects from Github and they don't work. I have an AMD Phenom II X4 AM3 and my graphics card is a GeForce 710 with 2GB of RAM. Maybe I'm asking for too much, I mean, some kind of program or project that can work on my PC locally. But I've seen so many VSTs and software that initially didn't work or worked slowly and then they made performance improvements that I hope someone can find a solution to that. Or that I can buy a better PC, although it's far from my possibilities now

so that's why I get the CUDA error... I have a 3Gb Nvidia and it will never work right?

What if I want to use CPU mode? Can someone explain where and how it should be set?

at least once, I would really like to try it..

New version is Working fine

Daria Zaritskaya - Vocal AI - FEAT - Halestorm - Wannabe

Thanks for the feedback. It works, but what's the difference with previous versions?

This might work depending on what one's particular computer setup may be, but as the dev's page has no data at all, it's actually quite disrespectful of any prospective future customers/users. I spent a fair amount of time downloading the app and some profiles (I've got a slow connection), just to find out that the app requires an internet connection, which I don't have on my music workstation. It would take less time for the dev to put basic system requirements (including internet connectivity) on his splash page, even if it contains no other information. (I may not have the proper hardware either, but who could tell?)

I asked about that in a much earlier post here (for version 1), back when the dev would read our comments and respond, and he promised that the upcoming version 2 would not require an online connection. I was quite thankful and supportive of his efforts. Well, it's now version 3.4.3, so I now have little choice but to consider his promises as empty, and view Rubin AI as any other snakeoil organization. I mean, if he had said no, you have to be online, then I would have thanked him and moved on, but leading people on is bad business and leaves a poor impression. If you're a dev looking for beta testers, don't just knowingly waste their time, as that will only earn you a bad reputation.

Just my two cents. I'm quite thankful for all the devs who provide us with goodies here, but am somewhat taken aback by this particular dev's evident disdain for the end users.

new update messed everything up, roaming folder error

is out New Update! V. 3 .5. 2 ..