registered members don't get popups... just sayin

  • Get the best VPN on the market with 66% Discount!
Samples » presets, patches, impulses
PastToFutureReverbs Analog Pan IRs! Impulse Responses (IRs) WAV screenshot
Impulse Responses (IRs) WAV | AudioZ Exclusive | 3.04 MB
As you might have already realized that the digital panning in your DAW does not work like it on the analog word.

When you pan something, It becomes hard to define its place in the mix, that's because we made these pan IRS

Your tracks will find their place in the stereo field with these IRs immediately!

No more thin-sounding out-of-phase instruments that will get lost in the mix!

It makes even more difference in a crowded mix!

You will get over 40 IRs in this set! Every pan positions are included (inclusive Center)

(24bit/96kHz & 441kHz)

Use 100% WET!

You will hear the mix first with the daw’s digital panning after that with the analog pan IRs panned to the same spot (70% left and right)

Check out the demo! (use studio monitors) Or at least headphones


This exclusive release was generously supplied to us by our member trae_hym
Thank you for supporting AudioZ!



download from free file storage
click to show download links

download from any file hoster with just one LinkSnappy account
download from more than 100 file hosters at once with LinkSnappy.

comments

  Member 24.11.2022 2 228
+139
Interesting. Did anybody notice the Souncloud mix sounded louder w/ the analog pan IR? Panning in the DAW does suck, so hopefully these actually make a difference.
  Resident 2.09.2022 16 129
+388
After panning, always give +3db gain
We, the people.
  Resident 2.02.2014 1 2648
+1455
Depends on pan law... In reaper you can choose it
.
  Member 28.12.2016 186
+65
is this more ridiculous than the studio monitor IRs? I really can't decide
  Member 24.11.2022 2 228
+139
Their next IR will be an air guitar in an anechoic chamber
  Member 21.05.2018 10 332
+312
By aligning the demo sound source sample by sample, strictly aligning the loudness values, and cancelling one of them in reverse phase, you can concretely listen to the difference between the two by ears.

Also, since Logic users can observe waveforms more closely than other DAWs, you can visually see the difference between them by comparing files that are strictly loudness-aligned.

As a result, I was able to confirm that the use of this IR actually changed the sound. (And analysis using the PluginDoctor confirms that interesting sound quality changes can be obtained.) So I believe that the changes are valid for those who want to simulate the production method strictly of analog environment. It is up to you to come up with your own ideas on how to utilize it.

Note: Unfortunately, however, the crucial pan effect is not accurate. Even with this IR, the respective left and right fields are not divided equally.
  Resident 14.11.2013 443
+113
OK, now if someone who's into this could explain:
An analog pan pot is a dual pot where one has its max reversed. Right? So when I dial it to the left the one pot going to the left channel is going up, while the one to the right channel is going down. It's just as you would have two faders with the same signal one going to left one going to right. If I move one up, the other down, I pan.
So how is this any different from digital. Sure, the pots could be linear or log that would change the loudness on the go. But that's it.
Anyone remember the craze for passive summing?
Same BS for people who dont know what an opamp does.
And to me this seems to be in the same league.
Just worse, with even more snake oil.
  Member 10.09.2016 129
+35
My instinct leans towards your point of view. This company has been slinging a lot weird IRs.

I like to use IRs creatively, rather than just using them for reverb.
  Member 12.01.2021 600
+294
Are they fuckin' kidding me? IRs are to capture sound, right? What sound exactly has left???

And tomorrow there'll be an IR of analogue light?
  Resident 8.06.2021 715
+186
They usually capture a space, or in this case, a circuit behavior. Just another response.
I was drunk when I wrote this
  Member 12.01.2021 600
+294
quote by rpmThey usually capture a space

Which is a good thing.

quote by rpmin this case, a circuit behavior

So the pan pot changes the sound, it has a characteristic? Aha. Then I recommend maintenance.
I suggest we go back to real stuff. ;-)
  Resident 14.11.2011 714
+91
it doesn't work for me,maybe it's on my side!
Software is like sex,it's better when it's free!
  Member 19.03.2014 3 410
+242
So I played around and it does sound different and indeed pleasing,
The IR sounds more glued to the mix where the DAW sounds like its superimposed on top if you get my drift. The Digital pan sounds like it has its only dimension and is not in the same one as the rest of the mix.
I found my DAW (Studio One) pan has similar settings, i am changing the gain on the IR to match my DAW so that i can mix quickly with my daw pan and then add these IRs at the end. So there wont be a significant change.
DAW IR
45 = 60%
55 = 70% (My standard panning area)
80 = 80% ( I rarely pan harder than this)
90 = 90% ( almost the same as hard only better)

Spread the Word