you can now donate with bitcoin or your bank card by clicking the piggy icon under the logo

  • Get the best VPN on the market with 66% Discount!
Samples » loops
Hijo De Ramon Music Library 22 Sonic Halllucinations (Compositions And Stems) WAV-FANTASTiC screenshot
FANTASTiC | 06 April 2024 | 929 MB
HDR is happy to bring you 10 new compositions composed by Grammy Award Winning Producer and Musician Adrian Quesada, Co-Founder of psychedelic soul band Black Pumas.

Quesada's deep musical history has seen him producing and performing in projects spanning funk, soul, psychedelia, and diverse strands of Latin music. He has performed with artists such as Prince, GZA, Los Lobos, Kali Uchis, among many others.

His most recent projects include Boleros Psicodélicos, a collaborative album recapturing the sound and feel of romantic Latin ballads of the '60s and '70s with featured vocals by Gaby Moreno, iLe, Girl Ultra, and more, and Jaguar Sound, an instrumental album that honors his foundational inspirations of hip-hop and cinematic scores. No matter the band or the style, Quesada's guitar playing and production style has a distinctive sound and collaborative spirit that have led to awards and respect from fellow artists, who line up eagerly to take part in his projects.

Recorded using all live instruments including guitars, bass, electric pianos, Mellotron, Arp Solina String machine, Hammond Organ, MCI Guitorgan using analog, transformer and tube based preamps and compressors. Processed through MCI JH 110 1" tape machine, Mixed through Collins broadcast console to Ampex 440 1/4" tape machine.



download from free file storage
click to show download links


download from any file hoster with just one LinkSnappy account
download from more than 100 file hosters at once with LinkSnappy.

comments

  Member 21.07.2020 103
+19
It's a shame that these types of stem/composition packs (the rucker collective also comes to mind) take 50% of all royalties on any song that exceeds a million plays, or even is just released on a "large" indie label (whatever that means). Especially considering they're made just like any other sample pack. The shame is that the music is usually solid and even sometimes very good, but I'd much rather go with a boom bap labs pack that is at least actually genuinely from a record, and not just made to sound like it, if you're not even keeping royalties anyway.
  Resident 22.11.2016 128
+28
Huh? You want people to have less than 50% or equal share for producing half the record? A lot of work goes into composing these. All we're doing is flipping the sample and adding drums. Be fr. I also compose myself, besides using samples I find here or on wavs & splice, and of course I buy them. Using samples from existing records is a huge risk. Rights holders of those records usually want more than 50%, so good luck with that.
  Member 21.07.2020 103
+19
"producing half the record", that's a huge assumption, speak for yourself, not everyone who is flipping samples is doing the bare minimum effort and just adding drums. what a weird assertion to make, and then adding "I also compose myself", okay? does that make your assumption about how others are using these packs any more valid? slow down dude. My point is that if you're going to be using something that's written specifically to be in a sample-pack, then there's plenty of stuff that's royalty free. this "you're gonna pay for the pack, and it's supposed to sound like a record, but it's not actually a record, buuuuuut you have to pay royalties like it is. oh also its double price for the stems" is just a weird janky inbetween that I don't really get.

tbh, it seems predatory, because there is NO mention of the royalty split conditions whatsoever on the product page or anywhere in the process of purchasing it, you have to seek out the information in their "about" page, which "about" doesn't really scream terms and conditions to me. the reason I mention boom bap labs is from what I've seen they have a disclaimer in the description that links to the info about them being a crate digging service. if these guys were a bit more transparent I probably wouldn't mind it so much, but as it stands I don't like it personally.
  Member 4.05.2021 10
+3
the internet is soooo weird. thanks for sounds Fantastic.
  Resident 6.12.2013 214
+71
Bro, I don't want to be rude here, but every real composer/producer knows, that people who flip samples are not real producers and are not really that creative. The lion share of the money should go to the person who actually makes the music, not to the person who flips the sample.
That doesn't mean, that people who flip samples shouldn't be able to make their money too and i think it is cool that they get enabled by music makers, who make these packs, but the fact that you are going on this self righteous rant here is a bit cringe tbh.
  Member 21.07.2020 103
+19
is "flipping" samples, the only way to use samples? and is "flipping" samples just cutting a loop and maybe adding some percs/drums? because that seems to be what your whole point is based on, and is just a caricature/straw-man of what is really as limitless a workflow as using synthesizers or anything else to make music. I don't mind you risking being rude, actually I respect it, or thinking that I'm cringe, so we're all good bro, but please, for the love of God, try to respond to what someone is actually saying, and not the least generous assumption you can possibly think of. it would be a lot more fun to talk to you if you did.
  Member 4.03.2018 66
+3
your comment ignant asf
  Member 4.03.2018 66
+3
you clearly dont understand business. when you use stems/compositions ya 50% of the record is broken down between you and the composers. they entitled to half or watever ya negotiate. A certain composer crew only wants 22% of any major placement i get. Other than that i can do wat i feel and reap !00% of all sales.
  Member 30.08.2022 66
+18
People on here arguing about splits.... Don't worry guys, Rucker isn't coming for your 100 plays on Soundcloud.

Spread the Word